3 ms·

Vertical/Grouped tabs would be major. All I want after that is a way to switch profiles from the browser like literally any other browser does.

alargemoose 2y ago
I’ve always thought the long running “Multi-Account Containers” in Firefox was a better implementation of this idea than having to switch profiles and open a whole new window, when often what I need is a tab or two for a profile other than the one I’m in. You can even configure proxies to run on a per-container basis if that’s useful. But I can certainly understand wanting to better separate what your working on then just tabs with colored indicators to remind you which is which at a glance. https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/containers https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/containers
- apocalyptic0n3 2y ago
  Those are useful but they lack the ability to have profile-specific history and bookmarks. I have a completely different set of bookmarks for Home and Work use and would never dream of mixing the two. Profiles are the only way to deal with that, but profiles are themselves difficult to work with.
  - loa_in_ 2y ago
    Why not have Home and Work directories im bookmarks? That accomplishes about the same.
    - Nab443 2y ago
      Sometimes you don't want to sync your work bookmarks with your personal account, but have both on your work laptop... or vixe versa
- luuurker 2y ago
  Recommending containers as a replacement for profiles is a bit like recommending a wheel as a replacement for a car. Containers do one thing very well and are very useful, but they don't let you have different bookmarks, add-ons, themes, settings, sync, etc.
- bwat48 2y ago
  Containers is not a replacement for profiles, they are completely separate use cases. Those who use multi-profile do so because they want separate bookmarks, settings, etc (e.g. personal profile vs work profile)... which containers cannot do.
i15e 2y ago
In Firefox you can go to about:profiles to easily open new windows using other profiles. I bookmark that page with a keyword for quick access. (Also see about:about for a list of other handy 'about' pages) A more classic-style profile switcher is available via the '-P' (or '-ProfileManager') command-line switch. If FF is in your $PATH you can run: firefox -P The '-P' switch can also take an argument of a profile name to open it directly. But yes, it would be nice if at least one of these options were exposed in the UI so it was more discoverable by users.
- jszymborski 2y ago
  I currently have a firefox -p shortcut, but it's auch worse experience than on chrome and friends.
- luuurker 2y ago
  That's not user friendly or works on all OS (eg: firefox -P). There are also other issues with Firefox profiles. For example, on macOS, using different profiles mess up Firefox's icons on the dock and profiles always open behind the current Firefox window. There's no way around this. Profile support on Firefox is bad and it's a shame because they've had them for years.
  - deleted 2y ago
    [deleted]
asadotzler 2y ago
It's not great, but you can make launchers with profile arguments and about:profiles can be bookmarked.

alargemoose 2y ago

I’ve always thought the long running “Multi-Account Containers” in Firefox was a better implementation of this idea than having to switch profiles and open a whole new window, when often what I need is a tab or two for a profile other than the one I’m in. You can even configure proxies to run on a per-container basis if that’s useful. But I can certainly understand wanting to better separate what your working on then just tabs with colored indicators to remind you which is which at a glance. https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/containers https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/containers

apocalyptic0n3 2y ago
Those are useful but they lack the ability to have profile-specific history and bookmarks. I have a completely different set of bookmarks for Home and Work use and would never dream of mixing the two. Profiles are the only way to deal with that, but profiles are themselves difficult to work with.
- loa_in_ 2y ago
  Why not have Home and Work directories im bookmarks? That accomplishes about the same.
  - Nab443 2y ago
    Sometimes you don't want to sync your work bookmarks with your personal account, but have both on your work laptop... or vixe versa
luuurker 2y ago
Recommending containers as a replacement for profiles is a bit like recommending a wheel as a replacement for a car. Containers do one thing very well and are very useful, but they don't let you have different bookmarks, add-ons, themes, settings, sync, etc.
bwat48 2y ago
Containers is not a replacement for profiles, they are completely separate use cases. Those who use multi-profile do so because they want separate bookmarks, settings, etc (e.g. personal profile vs work profile)... which containers cannot do.

i15e 2y ago

In Firefox you can go to about:profiles to easily open new windows using other profiles. I bookmark that page with a keyword for quick access. (Also see about:about for a list of other handy 'about' pages) A more classic-style profile switcher is available via the '-P' (or '-ProfileManager') command-line switch. If FF is in your $PATH you can run: firefox -P The '-P' switch can also take an argument of a profile name to open it directly. But yes, it would be nice if at least one of these options were exposed in the UI so it was more discoverable by users.

jszymborski 2y ago
I currently have a firefox -p shortcut, but it's auch worse experience than on chrome and friends.
luuurker 2y ago
That's not user friendly or works on all OS (eg: firefox -P). There are also other issues with Firefox profiles. For example, on macOS, using different profiles mess up Firefox's icons on the dock and profiles always open behind the current Firefox window. There's no way around this. Profile support on Firefox is bad and it's a shame because they've had them for years.
- deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]

asadotzler 2y ago

It's not great, but you can make launchers with profile arguments and about:profiles can be bookmarked.