2 ms·
You make it like you are there and know all the details. Obviously the regulating bodies approved it so they felt there was enough to go forward with it. The w
by DoesntMatter22 2y ago
You make it like you are there and know all the details. Obviously the regulating bodies approved it so they felt there was enough to go forward with it.
The way you discover a lot of problems is because of the trial patients. This happens ever day in medicine.
- numpad0 2y ago> The way you discover a lot of problems is because of the trial patients. I don't think that's the case with medical researches at all. They have good ideas of outcome with petri dishes and chimera mice before verifying the result with human trials. They didn't made COVID vaccines by trial and error on living humans, that could have taken a century. Especially with neural stuffs. If they can't make it work not with cultured cells and guinea pigs, there's nothing to be gained from scaling it out to an explosive failure on a launchpad.
- DoesntMatter22 2y agoThat doesn't even make any sense. Most cancer drugs that go for human trials never get to market. That's true for most drugs.
- numpad0 2y agoMost cancer drug candidates don't even make into human trials. Human trials are only done after they've figured it all the theories and simulations and animal testing and everything out over decades and it's all verified it won't kill people, then they run RCT and find out it actually does and cancel it. Your assertion is that drugs are discovered on fuck-around-and-find-out basis on live humans, which is simply false and stupid.