4 ms·
Right, the incentives are adverse: if they lower quality of service for free offerings, they'll be rewarded with more paying customers for reliable service. Bu
by w10-1 2y ago
Right, the incentives are adverse: if they lower quality of service for free offerings, they'll be rewarded with more paying customers for reliable service.
But quality does take money.
- madeofpalk 2y agoWhat are the incentives for more paying customers? Wikimedia Foundation, being a non-profit, has a lot less incentives to chase money at the expense of product quality.
- graemep 2y agoThe for profit parts are meant to chase money, and higher revenues justify higher management salaries ("I am running a bigger organisation so I deserve to be paid more"). This is widely accepted as being a motive for misaligned incentives in for profit businesses (with regard to takeovers) too.