4 ms·
Only very remotely related if you squint hard enough though, no? (sorry for sounding a bit rude, not my intention, I would like to read friendly but I can't fi
by jraph 2y ago
Only very remotely related if you squint hard enough though, no?
(sorry for sounding a bit rude, not my intention, I would like to read friendly but I can't find a nice way to point this out and still want to do it - it's just that I wouldn't find it very enjoyable if all HNers started commenting about general / random issues they encountered on some product P in a submission about a specific/historical issue in P - I'm sure we all encountered some issue while using Firefox / any browser at least once, especially with Twitter which screams buggy to me as a distant observer, I remember consistently having to try and refresh pages several times a few years ago to display a 140 character tweet - awful experience)
- ayewo 2y agoWell, x.com was working completely fine on my version of Firefox until yesterday so it’s an intentional breakage for Firefox users. My comment was more of a PSA to other Firefox users who are likely the ones also reading about the bug fix here, so it’s definitely on-topic. I guess you disagree which is fine. If they don’t fix it, I have to either switch to a different browser or device (mobile) to visit x.com. The good news is I’ll spend less time there.