Related doesn't meant dupe. I agree with @lolinder that you are being overzealous about marking dupes. I understand the utility of preventing dupes but your be

Related doesn't meant dupe. I agree with @lolinder that you are being overzealous about marking dupes. I understand the utility of preventing dupes but your behaviour is coming across as extremely bad faith here especially considering your top link is same as your last link and is pointing to a 5 day old post. @dang Please look.