3 ms·
Agreed. It's based on accepting personal payment to spend company time and resources doing something other than what the employer wants. Sounds like low-key bri
by MaxBarraclough 2y ago
Agreed. It's based on accepting personal payment to spend company time and resources doing something other than what the employer wants. Sounds like low-key bribery to me.
I imagine they're aware of this. The FAQ section states that employees are kept anonymous, but also says they verify if it's really a Google employee by sending an email to their google.com email address, which Google can of course see.
- actionfromafar 2y agoThe verification email can be intentionally vague and agreed upon in advance. "What's really your favorite band, then?" "Beatles, I guess."
- morpheuskafka 2y agoThe best way would be to send an email disguised as spam, and have the employee respond out of band with its contents without actually replying. Bonus points for sending similar emails to random @company.com addresses so receiving the email alone doesn’t suggest involvement.
- ethbr1 2y ago> to spend company time and resources doing something other than what the employer wants If you're salary, then that doesn't enter into the equation.
- atq2119 2y agoThe time doesn't, the resources do.