4 ms·
This sounds like a "30 seconds of usage just to find reasons to bash another G+ product" type of review. The Zagat rating system is pretty clearly described whe
by jxi 14y ago
This sounds like a "30 seconds of usage just to find reasons to bash another G+ product" type of review. The Zagat rating system is pretty clearly described when you choose a category, and it's also shown if you hover the score. Also, are you saying there's too much or too little text? First you're complaining that you can't see enough, then you're saying there's not enough information. There's a contradiction here.
I honestly think it looks fine, and seeing 3 restaurants per category to choose a category seems fine to me. I think there's all the info I need at each step of drilling down as well. Looks great to me.
- twelvechairs 14y ago> Also, are you saying there's too much or too little text? Its both. There is loads too much stuff on the screen (that I'm not interested in in the slightest), and at the same time it is very difficult for me to try to make a comparison of multiple restaurants. Whether I want to do this by average review, price, location, by looking at individual reviews, etc. it all involves a huge amount of scrolling and clicking and remembering where to scroll to on the previous page etc. (much more than necessary). At least for the way I want to look for restaurants. Actually the Zagat rating system is pretty straightforward, but I don't seem to get it in my city (outside the USA), just an 'overall score'. Also - Apologies if I was a little on the condescending side - its genuinely because I want google to produce a good product that I can use, but for me I can never see myself finding this useful.