4 ms·
Weird that “Mikhail Gilula was a brilliant innovator who also left -in a destructive way that erased the value of his contributions, and -that he was shown muc
by noncoml 2y ago
Weird that
“Mikhail Gilula was a brilliant innovator who also left
-in a destructive way that erased the value of his contributions, and
-that he was shown much generosity just makes it more painful.“
was changed to:
“Mikhail Gilula was a brilliant innovator that has shown much generosity.”
Looks like the one making the change didn’t understate the original comments? They should have stopped at “brilliant innovator”
- saurik 2y agoThey wording was reversed, however; I took this to be an explicit and intended way of righting the scales for what had previously been written.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- mekoka 2y agoYup, Mikhail ftw. He first was the recipient of generosity, an edit later he's being credited for that same generosity. Let's see if Reiser's newly found magnanimity will let this generous slip slide.