4 ms·
Your whole premise is that some other person's data may be released under a FOIA request with data surfaced in error, yet you demand rigor from commenters respo
by hiatus 2y ago
Your whole premise is that some other person's data may be released under a FOIA request with data surfaced in error, yet you demand rigor from commenters responding to you when you provide no evidence yourself of the potential issue.
- chaps 2y agoI'm not sure what your comment is digging at. Are you asking me to give you examples where the wrong data was leaked through FOIA? Because if so, -- https://mchap.io/that-time-the-city-of-seattle-accidentally-gave-me-32m-emails-for-40-dollars4997.html https://mchap.io/that-time-the-city-of-seattle-accidentally-... It's not even an uncommon issue. I'm currently dealing with a large local police department who released to me thousands of peoples' SSNs, finger print hash, tattoos, etc etc from ALPR data in a FOIA lawsuit where I was co-plaintiff. They saw no problem with it and asked us if we expected them to redact the info. So yeah, I fully expect somebody to fuck up at some point.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- kbolino 2y agoIt's not that your concerns about FOIA are invalid as such, it's just that the data any ISP, as we understand the term in the West, can collect is quite limited. On-device history, browser telemetry, leaks from websites themselves, etc are all richer targets for monitoring and deanonymization.