3 ms·

i don’t see why any of the things you’re describing are criteria for thinking, it seems just arbitrarily picking things humans do and saying this is somehow con

• verdverm 2y ago
  It's more to point out how far the LLMs we have today are from anything that ought to be considered thoughts. They are far more mechanical than anything else
  • whimsicalism 2y ago
    you’re just retreating into tautologies - my question was why these are the criteria for thought it’s fine though, this was as productive as i expected
    • verdverm 2y ago
      I'm not listing criteria for thought I'm listing things that current LLMs cannot do (or things they do that thinking entities would not) to argue they are so simple they are far from anything that resembles thinking > it’s fine though, this was as productive as i expected A product of your replies becoming lowering in quality, and becoming more argumentative, so I will discontinue now