2 ms·
I can see them being useful for reducing the tedious cases. Especially the failure paths. Otherwise, my view is that if a unit test can be easily auto generated
by viraptor 2y ago
I can see them being useful for reducing the tedious cases. Especially the failure paths. Otherwise, my view is that if a unit test can be easily auto generated and the code is not already covered by a feature/integration test, then maybe it's a waste of time to look at it. I'd be more interested in integration tests generated from a description... which doesn't work that great yet.
Adding the simple unit tests ensures the current design of the internals is suddenly more "final" than before, and maybe more than intended.
- pawelmurias 2y agoThe idea behind the facebook paper was to generate extra tests in the style of the ones that exist that cover extra cases. Generating tests from a description will likely suck because the LLM will just generate obvious tests and possibly make a logic mistake while you want the tricky cases.