3 ms·
Same really. Many people see unit tests as a chore, rather than the foundation of a codebase. If every project could get 60-80% coverage basically for free (ex
by xandrius 2y ago
Same really.
Many people see unit tests as a chore, rather than the foundation of a codebase. If every project could get 60-80% coverage basically for free (except some super novel or intricate path, which should already have tons of unit tests), I see that as a net win for everyone.
For many of the CRUD platforms, you could even get close to 90% with a bit of hand holding.
So I see nothing wrong.
As they say: don't let perfect be the enemy of good.