> My argument is about genocide. And my argument is that your "genocide argument" is overnarrow and has the effect of picking a side in a conflict that cannot

> My argument is about genocide. And my argument is that your "genocide argument" is overnarrow and has the effect of picking a side in a conflict that cannot and will not end unless people stop perpetuate it like that. Stopping your particular favorite enemy has the effect of empowering and emboldening their enemies, who are just as bad.