> Does she not have the right to use her own voice for money merely because she sounds like another, more famous persons? Of course she can. She just can't fo

> Does she not have the right to use her own voice for money merely because she sounds like another, more famous persons? Of course she can. She just can't fool consumers into thinking that she is SJ. The problem here is not that the voice sounds identical to SJ, it's that the consumers are led to believe they that is SJ's voice.