4 ms·
emacs's integration with C/C++'s compile/build/debug cycle is insanely good. M-x compile and M-x gdb work perfectly. Integration with Common Lisp (SBCL at lea
by mdakin 18y ago
emacs's integration with C/C++'s compile/build/debug cycle is insanely good. M-x compile and M-x gdb work perfectly.
Integration with Common Lisp (SBCL at least) and Python are both also excellent.
I can't speak about other languages/systems but all the ones I use extensively have really tight emacs integration. Perhaps Java integration is weak?
- lallysingh 18y agoCompared to how well you're coddled in something like Netbeans/eclipse, it's tough to be satisfied in Emacs. They'll search the entire classpath (not just the classes you've written) and find every match that could be usable in the given situation (according to your import declarations), using your project definition for class file resolution. On C++, it's harder when you start using templates. Seems only systems with tightly-integrated compilers do a decent job here.