4 ms·
The “other” in “people” needs to be there :) One may cite Grothendieck as counterexamples, but maybe they still only had themselves in their adjacent subfields
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
The “other” in “people” needs to be there :)
One may cite Grothendieck as counterexamples, but maybe they still only had themselves in their adjacent subfields (at the time they made their most impactful discoveries, anyway)