Yeah, when I read Trevor's post, I saw assumptions that aren't that of a stretch and some science facts. I also totally forgot about his first post and this one

Yeah, when I read Trevor's post, I saw assumptions that aren't that of a stretch and some science facts. I also totally forgot about his first post and this one. From how I saw, libel cases go in California as an innocent observer - nearly impossible to prove. Which makes me think Trevor hit Aaron's nerve. That makes me shy away from Lumina because that is some thin skin from the CEO. Also, I've only ever heard such threats from people that aren't going to sue and only seen courtrooms in Suits. At least in California, Lumina would have to prove every claim as false (probably not a good for business...) and then, moreover, prove that Trevor was acting in malice. Defamation cases deal with fact, not opinions, and IMO the first post was full of opinions and scientific facts. (yeah yeah, saying "I think" before a statement doesn't turn it into an opinion, IMO not the case)