4 ms·

> Microsoft is giving ARM another try with a special branding that's supposed to guarantee some level of performance and quality. I hope so. I've been a happy

> Microsoft is giving ARM another try with a special branding that's supposed to guarantee some level of performance and quality. I hope so. I've been a happy Windows for Arm user (via Parallels on Apple Silicon) for a year+ and it's been good. Based on that, I think drivers are going to be the biggest PITA for ARM-based PC users for the first couple years — for example, Google Drive doesn't work for that reason.

abdusco 2y ago
I tried Windows on UTM (based on qemu, I believe) and the graphics were choppy. I attributed that to the lack of graphics acceleration. Is it also the same on Parallels?
- temac 2y ago
  Parallels has excellent graphics acceleration.
  - rcarmo 2y ago
    Yep. Both Parallels and VMware have good graphics acceleration, but Parallels is better. I too have been running a Windows ARM VM for work for a year or so.
ZeroWidthJoiner 2y ago
> I think drivers are going to be the biggest PITA for ARM-based PC users for the first couple years — for example, Google Drive doesn't work for that reason. Google Drive does ship with Arm64 drivers, and patching the platform check out of the installer gets them installed just fine (40 84 f6 74 08 -> 40 84 f6 90 90). No idea why they're blocking the install.