4 ms·
> "Consciousness requires a soul" is only useful if you understand what a soul is. False. It can help you understand what it is. "Apples are red" is only usef
by hypertele-Xii 2y ago
> "Consciousness requires a soul" is only useful if you understand what a soul is.
False. It can help you understand what it is.
"Apples are red" is only useful if you already know the color red?
But if you know apples then you've just learned something about colors!
- mannykannot 2y agoThat's all very well (up to the point where I have a green apple in front of me!), but if someone tells me something to the effect that consciousness is identical with soul, all I have learned is something about their personal take on lexicography. If they go on to say, for example, that the soul is immortal, I have not learned that consciousness is immortal; I have learned something about the speaker's beliefs.
- hypertele-Xii 2y agoNo, you have learned that consciousness has something to do with immortality. Examine that for a minute, you'll see it's obviously true. Our genes are an organic mechanism seeking immortality of consciousness through instincts, some of which can be awe-inspiringly complex, like spider webs. We praise language and culture for its ability to retain information across time (approaching immortality). That you're dismissing this as some kind of lexicographical or subjective belief thing reveals how intensely your mind seeks to dismiss it. The truth is purifying fire that burns away parasitical spirits doing their damnest to convince you otherwise.