4 ms·
OK but let's not forget that YouTube was originally an independent offering and Google's own competitor never got off the ground, leading to them just acquiring
by emodendroket 2y ago
OK but let's not forget that YouTube was originally an independent offering and Google's own competitor never got off the ground, leading to them just acquiring it.
- andrewla 2y agoThat's true and easy to forget -- at the time, YouTube offered far and above the best experience for content creators and uploaders. And their end-user experience (the flash-based player) was miles ahead of the competition.
- DonnyV 2y agoYes, but they were never profitable and if Google didn't buy them. They probably would of eventually failed or completely change their model to survive. What the original YouTube team did was was create a great brand and experience. Thats why Google's version never took off.
- emodendroket 2y agoThey probably didn't intend to be profitable because their goal was user acquisition at the time. Intending to be profitable from the start would have implied a totally different approach and priorities.
- raydev 2y ago> Google's own competitor never got off the ground, leading to them just acquiring it They only put about 1.5 years of effort into "getting it off the ground" before acquiring YouTube in 2006. I think they just didn't want to try anymore when they knew they could buy the YouTube audience. Of course, GV continued to exist for a few more years because Google, but still. GV always seemed half-assed.
- emodendroket 2y agoIt had a lot of fans because the video itself was of a higher quality than YouTube offered at the time.
- pcchristie 2y agoI really liked the local player that would download videos continuously on my crappy dial up connection. You downloaded a file (a few kb) and it just perpetually downloaded the data until you came back hrs later and it was ready. Man I can't believe I was that patient.