3 ms·

Swift developers are not that many. It's less than 5% of respondents to the Stack Overflow developer survey [1]. Microsoft and Google each have languages/ecos

Swift developers are not that many. It's less than 5% of respondents to the Stack Overflow developer survey [1]. Microsoft and Google each have languages/ecosystems with larger developer share (Google at over 6% for Dart, and Microsoft at over 27% for C#). [1] https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2023/#technology-most-popular-technologies https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2023/#technology-most-popula...

airstrike 2y ago
less than 5% vs. over 6% is not that big of a difference
- deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
Rimtariro 2y ago
It's not a zero-sum game, they don't have to reduce support for other languages. It would be a completely new source of developers for these platforms. Better 1% than 0%, and I would say that effort for that would not outweigh the possible benefits and income from new devs/apps.
- talldayo 2y ago
  It's not Microsoft and Google's job to write Apple's software for them. It's like complaining that Apple doesn't write a good Dotnet runtime; of course they don't. It's not their job, and they don't want to anyways. > It would be a completely new source of developers for these platforms. I have no idea who you're referring to here. Who are the developers that are locked-in to iOS/MacOS but would consider ChromeOS or Windows if it supported Swift better? I cannot think of a single person I know that fills that bill. If anything it's the other way around, where people end up switching away because they don't have any use for Swift/AppleScript.
binkHN 2y ago
Kotlin is at 9% and Java developers, at 30% here, could easily switch over.
briandear 2y ago
Is that survey actually scientific? I have been doing Ruby and Swift for years and never completed that survey. That survey is of reasonably active users to Stack Overflow — there is a selection bias. There isn’t a lot of great Swift content on SO, so that’s going to attract fewer developers to answer the survey.

airstrike 2y ago

less than 5% vs. over 6% is not that big of a difference

deleted 2y ago
[deleted]

Rimtariro 2y ago

It's not a zero-sum game, they don't have to reduce support for other languages. It would be a completely new source of developers for these platforms. Better 1% than 0%, and I would say that effort for that would not outweigh the possible benefits and income from new devs/apps.

talldayo 2y ago
It's not Microsoft and Google's job to write Apple's software for them. It's like complaining that Apple doesn't write a good Dotnet runtime; of course they don't. It's not their job, and they don't want to anyways. > It would be a completely new source of developers for these platforms. I have no idea who you're referring to here. Who are the developers that are locked-in to iOS/MacOS but would consider ChromeOS or Windows if it supported Swift better? I cannot think of a single person I know that fills that bill. If anything it's the other way around, where people end up switching away because they don't have any use for Swift/AppleScript.

binkHN 2y ago

Kotlin is at 9% and Java developers, at 30% here, could easily switch over.

briandear 2y ago

Is that survey actually scientific? I have been doing Ruby and Swift for years and never completed that survey. That survey is of reasonably active users to Stack Overflow — there is a selection bias. There isn’t a lot of great Swift content on SO, so that’s going to attract fewer developers to answer the survey.