3 ms·
For 8KB, you’re better off just using paper and storing it properly.
by kayodelycaon 2y ago
For 8KB, you’re better off just using paper and storing it properly.
- 404mm 2y agoOr a stone tablet. Encryption won’t matter in 200 years anyway
- AshamedCaptain 2y agoAfter having to retype a couple of armor'ed PGP keys printed on paper, your opinion may change.
- wheybags 2y agoQr codes on paper?
- kayodelycaon 2y agoGood idea, nothing wrong with including a QR code on the first page. Would serve as a Rosetta Stone for other QRs if specification gets lost.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- mxmlnkn 2y agoIs OCR still not working reliably with all the recent innovations in ML?
- bartonfink 2y agoif it's important enough to archive for hundreds of years it's worth that. Your whataboutism helps nothing, champ.
- M95D 2y agoPaperBack is a free application that allows you to back up your precious files on the ordinary paper in the form of the oversized bitmaps. If you have a good laser printer with the 600 dpi resolution, you can save up to 500,000 bytes of uncompressed data on the single A4/Letter sheet. Integrated packer allows for much better data density - up to 3,000,000+ (three megabytes) of C code per page. For 600 dpi printer you will need a scanner with at least 900 dpi physical (let me emphasize, physical, not interpolated) resolution. https://ollydbg.de/Paperbak/#1 https://ollydbg.de/Paperbak/#1