The idea is that it should be about a tenth of the cost compared to S3 or DynamoDB. Is that not how you read the pricing? Or do you just think that’s still too

The idea is that it should be about a tenth of the cost compared to S3 or DynamoDB. Is that not how you read the pricing? Or do you just think that’s still too expensive? EDIT: Or maybe it’s because reads are expensive? That’s a consequence of the write optimization. The idea is that potential customers will be doing 90%+ writes.