3 ms·
Not sure, one could say they use their dominant search position and revenue to serve video at a loss and distort the market, making it very hard for anyone with
by vasco 2y ago
Not sure, one could say they use their dominant search position and revenue to serve video at a loss and distort the market, making it very hard for anyone without an existing money printing machine to bootstrap a profitable video site. See vimeo.
- alickz 2y agothat was my assumption when i read they weren't profitable and also that streaming and storing video at that scale is almost a natural monopoly, with how much it must cost and how hard it would be to compete without existing resources