3 ms·
If you're including actual announcement then why ignore this portion too? > Due to our concerns about malicious applications of the technology, we are not rele
by lannisterstark 2y ago
If you're including actual announcement then why ignore this portion too?
> Due to our concerns about malicious applications of the technology, we are not releasing the trained model. As an experiment in responsible disclosure, we are instead releasing a much smaller model(opens in a new window) for researchers to experiment with, as well as a technical paper(opens in a new window).
If you note, that's pretty much verbatim to what I said. So no, people don't have defective memories, some people just selectively quote stuff :P
You should actually read the paper associated with it. It's largely a journey in "why would you think that" reading.
- ben_w 2y ago> If you're including actual announcement then why ignore this portion too? Because: > some people just selectively quote stuff And that's what I'm demonstrating with the bit I did quote, which substantially changes the frame of what you're saying. Our written language doesn't allow us to put all the caveats and justifications into the same space, and therefore it is an error to ignore a later section of the same document that makes the what and why clear, along with caveating this as "an experiment" and "we know others can do this" and "we're not sure if we're right".
- IanCal 2y ago"so advanced it's a threat to humankind" and "some people might use this in a bad way" are incredibly different.