3 ms·
A problem with live is that everyone wants the content at the same time. One client can only serve two more after it has the content. Any drop in connection is
by IanCal 2y ago
A problem with live is that everyone wants the content at the same time. One client can only serve two more after it has the content. Any drop in connection is also very disruptive because you don't have a big buffer and everyone wants the content now.
A place this could work is streaming a conference, live-ish is the goal and the producers aren't rich. Sports would be the worst case.
- thaumasiotes 2y ago> A problem with live is that everyone wants the content at the same time. Isn't the point of the P2P approach that it gets better the more this is true?
- IanCal 2y agoNo, not really on those timescales. If it's about a popular show that's released the whole season today, yeah absolutely. Pulling ep1 from my neighbour while they watch ep2 makes sense. It doesn't really work for something you want to watch simultaneously and reliably. I have to wait for my neighbour to get the chunk I want, then I get it. If they got it from someone else, we form a bigger chain, and then you have all the broadcasting etc to figure out who to actually get a chunk of video from. Hearing the street cheer while I watch my national team captain take a runup for a penalty is really quite bad.