3 ms·
There are still many menial jobs that cannot be automated (not cost effectively). Encouraging people with menial jobs to seek higher effective wages increases
by harshreality 14y ago
There are still many menial jobs that cannot be automated (not cost effectively). Encouraging people with menial jobs to seek higher effective wages increases everyone's cost of living.
Until robots can do all the menial work, and build themselves too, a lot of people are going to have shit jobs. I don't see any way around that.
Philosophically, is it better to have more people each doing X hours/yr of menial work, rather than fewer people doing X+n hours/yr of menial work?
In the spirit of the recent thread about EVE, it seems to me that the impulse which game makers depend on to keep people playing games, particularly MMOs, is similar to the impulse that keeps people doing menial jobs. Both involve long hours spent doing uninteresting work, and rare random rewards. People are conditioned to feel good about getting through tedious real work as long as they get occasional random high-value rewards (salary or praise or both).
- chc 14y agoAutomation is only one way to get things done faster. In truth, many jobs would take less time if people would just stop wasting so much of it — no automation required. As they say, work expands to fill the time available.
- zanny 14y agoI don't think it isn't that we can't build robots that can do menial work (mcdonalds casheers, farm laborers, road workers) it is that the investment to get the return is not worth the cultural wall to replacing dead end depressing work for people who would otherwise have no jobs due to limited education or drive for excellence.
- dasil003 14y agoI wonder if we are actually evolved to enjoy menial labor with the occasional pay check.