4 ms·
> It's not a question of ignorance, it's a question of intent. > If you walk into Walmart and intentionally walk out with a banana without paying, you can't ge
by sobkas 2y ago
> It's not a question of ignorance, it's a question of intent.
> If you walk into Walmart and intentionally walk out with a banana without paying, you can't get out of prosecution by claiming that you didn't know it was illegal to do that.
> If, on the other hand, you accidentally neglect to scan the banana at the self checkout then it is a valid defense to say that you thought you'd already scanned it in and you must have gotten confused by all the other items you were handling.
> Theft requires intent.
No one will care what you say when you will get caught. https://www.good.is/lawyer-explains-the-risk-of-using-self-checkouts-at-stores https://www.good.is/lawyer-explains-the-risk-of-using-self-c...
- lolinder 2y ago> In a clip uploaded on TikTok, Jernigan explains Call me old fashioned, but I'm not going to take legal advice from TikTok personalities, especially when the claim sounds like one of those scarebait articles newspapers print on a bad news day.