8 ms·
Right, calling it technically lossless is wrong but 422 HQ gives impressive results so I we can probably safely say that it is "practically" lossless. In DaVin
by can16358p 2y ago
Right, calling it technically lossless is wrong but 422 HQ gives impressive results so I we can probably safely say that it is "practically" lossless.
In DaVinci Resolve, many tools go awry with image sequences: for example temporal noise reduction simply doesn't work with a compound clip with image sequences, I also remember having problems with caching performance. I have a few very strange/buggy problems with Resolve though I love color grading with it regardless, so I want to avoid the buggy sides of Resolve (as it's one of the buggiest software I've ever used) but use the upsides of it (grading and some OpenFX filters).
It would help me on this process.