3 ms·
I normally hate the ChatGPT spam on this forum, but this was not a bad use for it (assuming it wasn't lying).
by pclmulqdq 2y ago
I normally hate the ChatGPT spam on this forum, but this was not a bad use for it (assuming it wasn't lying).
- fragmede 2y ago> assuming it wasn't lying that's the key issue with this kind of ChatGPT writing. Code you can relatively easily check for correctness - just run it. For analysis on this level, it really had to be based on facts and reality, not generated by a bullshit generator to be of actual use.
- pclmulqdq 2y agoI actually went back to the source it pointed out - SEC filings and the call transcripts are all public. It isn't citing the most recent statements on YouTube by far, but the citation of 2017 was at least correct. In this case, digging through all the material to find the factual basis is the hard part, and corroborating it is not (for those who care).