> The largest nuclear power plant in the US is in a freaking _desert_ ... the plants just need to be designed for that. That's two key issues here that you

> The largest nuclear power plant in the US is in a freaking _desert_ ... the plants just need to be designed for that. That's two key issues here that you just carelessly tossed aside. For one, central Europe doesn't have deserts or any large uninhabited regions for that matter. The US has a population density of 33.6 ppl/mk², compared to 236/km² in Germany. All nuclear power plants in Europe are therefore located near rivers and cooled accordingly. Secondly, building nuclear power plants takes a shitload of money and time. Case in point: * Hinkley Point C UK - significantly delayed, to date 50% cost overrun; only continued after the UK government gave long term guarantees, including fixed minimum electricity prices * Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant Unit 3 Finland - 13 years delayed, 45% cost overrun * Flamanville Nuclear Power Plant Unit 3 France - 12 years behind schedule, a staggering 5x cost overrun * Plant Vogtle Unit 3-4 USA - massive delays and 2.4x cost overrun, Westinghouse filed for Chapter 11 due to losses from its nuclear business during construction * etc. So no, Germany didn't need _more_ nuclear.