28 ms·

I'm not sure how you expect the discussion to be accurate or informative without details that the article you summarized happily goes into. We already see confu

I'm not sure how you expect the discussion to be accurate or informative without details that the article you summarized happily goes into. We already see confusion about where it's rolled out because we're reading you, not Twitter Engineering. What does your post add to theirs? Honestly?

apievangelist 14y ago
I'm not looking to add anything to theirs. Thats why I link to them. I'm looking to get discussion here and on Twitter...while I formulate my own thoughts...and more analysis. That's why I said...your the detail of this post.
- deleted 14y ago
  [deleted]
- SkyMarshal 14y ago
  >I'm not looking to add anything to theirs. Thats why I link to them. Then link to them here as well. Save your own blog post for when you've got some original insight to add, then submit it to HN. Not before. >I'm looking to get discussion here and on Twitter...while I formulate my own thoughts...and more analysis. That's why I said...your the detail of this post. That's lazy as shit.
- canadiancreed 14y ago
  So we can remove your link, go straight to the twitter page (which would have probably been linked here eventually anyways) and not lose anything? Sounds great. Let's do that.