3 ms·
probably because it's a lazy argument and doesn't have much substance to it and is only speculative. it also has ridiculous bias in its writing e.g. uses bootle
by 93po 2y ago
probably because it's a lazy argument and doesn't have much substance to it and is only speculative. it also has ridiculous bias in its writing e.g. uses bootlegger imagery to describe these companies.
- petermcneeley 2y agoThe article claims that these AI companies are calling for regulation. This is a factual claim. The speculative claim would be to introspect the mind and determine why they might be asking for regulation. This is a very reasonable Agent simulation.