3 ms·
You’re getting voted down which is unfortunate, because there’s a larger strategy here worth discussing. My opinion is thus: The US has learned from China’s l
by exabrial 2y ago
You’re getting voted down which is unfortunate, because there’s a larger strategy here worth discussing.
My opinion is thus:
The US has learned from China’s low intensity conflict strategy. If the US had given Ukraine patriot batteries, F-16s, and tanks on day 1, The reaction from Russia could’ve been nuclear. As much as I want to see a bully get punched back in the face, It is not a good strategy to avoid disastrous escalation. Slowly ramping up the technology sent and uncuffing Ukraine gradually is the actual optimal path.
- oblio 2y agoExcept for the fact that the US is backing down and the chances of the big aid package voted recently to be the last one are quite high. Also Ukraine is running out of people, out of money, out of everything, and regaining lost territory is slowly becoming incredibly difficult. Ukraine's future was probably ground to pieces for the next 2-3 decades due to all the Western indecision between 2022 and 2024.
- exabrial 2y ago>Ukraine is running out of people, out of money, out of everything, and regaining lost territory is slowly becoming incredibly difficult I agree and recognize that is the other reality.