3 ms·
Then the person using an LLM to produce something that infringes on cooyright is responsible. They better check for every produced output, whether it infringes,
by zelphirkalt 2y ago
Then the person using an LLM to produce something that infringes on cooyright is responsible. They better check for every produced output, whether it infringes, since they are not creating it by thinking themselves and coming to a solution, but are using a tool that stochastically regurgitates bits and pieces it has seen before. Not much credit is deserved.
- slowhadoken 2y agoBoth OpenAI and the user are infringing on the artist and neither are making art.
- zelphirkalt 2y agoIt is about time, that we get a solid framework for handling those and other cases. I would also argue, that models learned from publicly available data need to stay public as well.
- slowhadoken 2y agoYup, the fake conversation about LLMs being A.I. is a distraction from a more important conversation about public knowledge and information. OpenAI is not a proper education tool but it presents its presented that way. It also a platform form propaganda and censorship.