No contemporary analysis. Except maybe https://www.nature.com/articles/189739a0.pdf https://www.nature.com/articles/189739a0.pdf Or perhaps https://academic.

No contemporary analysis. Except maybe https://www.nature.com/articles/189739a0.pdf https://www.nature.com/articles/189739a0.pdf Or perhaps https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/477/3/3791/4964763?login=false https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/477/3/3791/4964763?lo... Or maybe you mean https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02702326 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02702326 Ok sure but there's definitely nothing like https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11963-008-1005-7 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11963-008-1005-7 or https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/127965/pdf https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/127965/pdf or https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-09994-8_43 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-09994-8_43 or ... There are hundreds of contemporary analyses of that star. Just search for HD 101065 and you'll find tons and tons of them.