I didn’t say it was like climate change, I said it was like claiming climate change is not real. > There are very real disagreements between very real experts

I didn’t say it was like climate change, I said it was like claiming climate change is not real. > There are very real disagreements between very real experts on just how dangerous these new technologies are …but they do not dispute that the technology is impactful. In fact, anyone who claims it is just “Text continuation”(quote) is being deliberately disingenuous and deliberately downplaying it. > Comparing skepticism about AI alarmism to climate change denial is just lazy internet rhetoric Unlike calling AI “Text continuation”? It’s awfully convenient it’s only lazy internet rhetoric when it’s coming from the other side. Hm? Why is only one side allowed to do that? Would you care to call out the other side for being reductionist? That’s a very high horse you’re sitting on.