4 ms·
You're quite correct. My apologies. I misunderstood the 39411 number to be the total number of gems submitted over all time, rather than the total number of ex
by adrianhoward 14y ago
You're quite correct. My apologies.
I misunderstood the 39411 number to be the total number of gems submitted over all time, rather than the total number of extant versions. My bad.
- bgilroy26 14y agoDon't worry, it happens all the time [1]. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3238544 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3238544
- vog 14y agoIronically, this is the same issue of sloppy testing, just at another level (i.e. missing usability tests on the http://rubygems.org/gems http://rubygems.org/gems website for at least months, maybe years)