3 ms·
Interesting, could you share some? I just read the New Yorker article in detail, and it did seem like a lot of circumstantial evidence and nothing direct. It re
by rich_sasha 2y ago
Interesting, could you share some? I just read the New Yorker article in detail, and it did seem like a lot of circumstantial evidence and nothing direct. It reads eerily like a misunderstanding of statistics and an old guy (the main pediatrics expert) making up conjectures and presenting them as evidence.
But then I don't know much about the case so I can't be sure. Would be great to hear the counterpoints.
- lofenfew 2y agoI don't know either, I'm just making a reliable statement about any piece of journalism.
- Tao3300 2y agoGoing from "good reason" to "because journalism" is a totally airheaded take.
- lofenfew 2y agoYour original comment presented it as if you'd come up with it or evaluated it yourself, rather than merely repeating a biased story someone else wrote. This seems far more dishonest than anything I did.