5 ms·
> Especially semi-technical people who’s specialty isn’t programming. That would be worse kind . Imaging fixing bug of those people with LLM Hallucinated code
by v3ss0n 2y ago
> Especially semi-technical people who’s specialty isn’t programming.
That would be worse kind . Imaging fixing bug of those people with LLM Hallucinated code that runs but having wrong logic all over the place.
I reduced use of LLM for coding these days. I only ask it to generate templates or write some repetitive codes and sampledata.
- waldrews 2y agoCool how we're far enough into the adoption cycle that 'I reduced use of LLM' is a mainstream thing to hear among sophisticated techies.
- mattgreenrocks 2y agoSome of us haven’t even incorporated LLMs into our development workflows yet. :)
- nineteen999 2y agoSome of us looked at it and decided the results were so bad it was a net loss to even try.
- waldrews 2y agoSome of us looked at it and decided the results were so bad it was a net loss to even try, but it was just so cool...
- mattgreenrocks 2y agoYep. Even the few times I use it via the ChatGPT interface I spend as much time fixing the bad assumptions it made.
- v3ss0n 2y agoEven with GPT4 the most useful usecase are to generate stuff that are so repetative and daunting to type and refactor code that interns wrote. And making it write documentations. What i love most is to draft out project specs from user's requirements and to generate user stories. Or let it write leet-code like problems that is too boring to do manually. The actual layer of coding is still best done by experienced engineer's biological brains.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]