4 ms·
If everyone fake, no one can. Maybe it will sabotage video as viable evidence and eliminate the surveillance apparatchik of cameras everywhere as useful in pro
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
If everyone fake, no one can. Maybe it will sabotage video as viable evidence and eliminate the surveillance apparatchik of cameras everywhere as useful in proving anything.
- ben_w 2y agoThat everyone can libel doesn't mean no one can. That everyone can perjure themselves by libelling someone while under oath doesn't mean no one can. And if anything, it would strengthen rather than eliminate surveillance apparatchik of cameras everywhere — as term "apparatchik" has its origins in soviet government, in this context it would therefore be exactly the subset of surveillance apparatus[0] that the government deemed trustworthy. [0] and now I'm wondering if "apparatchik" was an auto-corrupt of "apparatus"?
- llamaimperative 2y agoYou’re aware some people like having security cameras available to prove things, like who broke into their homes or jumped them on the street, right? “Finally! We’ll have no way to prove anything at all! This is a big win!” Makes zero sense.