3 ms·
Yes, here are further links for those interested: - HN discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37650402 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37650402
by rossant 2y ago
Yes, here are further links for those interested:
- HN discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37650402 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37650402
- Blog post https://www.cambridgeblog.org/2023/05/a-journey-into-the-shaken-baby-syndrome-abusive-head-trauma-controversy/ https://www.cambridgeblog.org/2023/05/a-journey-into-the-sha...
- Scientific introduction https://cyrille.rossant.net/introduction-shaken-baby-syndrome-controversy/ https://cyrille.rossant.net/introduction-shaken-baby-syndrom...
- taxicabjesus 2y agooh, the submission was yours too, didn't notice until just now. Hah! I'd added the comment linked above to my favorites, which helped me track it down. Thanks for the links. Edit: > The "cognitive bias" you mention (does it have a name? perhaps cognitive dissonance?) is a likely reason for this amount of antagonism. [0] [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37671824 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37671824 I think the term you're looking for is 'confirmation bias': https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
- taxicabjesus 2y agoThis might be a better term: confirmation bias called in military parlance ‘tactical fixation’