4 ms·
That might be true of specific models or specific APIs for accessing them, but I’d argue isn’t even remotely true of neural networks generally or generatively-p
by benreesman 2y ago
That might be true of specific models or specific APIs for accessing them, but I’d argue isn’t even remotely true of neural networks generally or generatively-pretrained decoder-only attention-inspired language models in particular.
Ideally if you want a model’s weights to include a credible representation of non-trivial data you want it somewhere in the training pipeline (usually earlier is better for important stuff but that’s a hubristic at best), but there’s transfer learning of various kinds, and joint losses of countless kinds (CLIP in SD-style diffusors come to mind), and fine tunes (if that doesn’t just count as transfer learning), and dimensionality reduction that is often remarkably effective, and multi-tower models like what evolved into DLRM, and I’m forgetting/omitting easily 100x the approaches I mentioned.
It’s possible I misunderstand you, so please elaborate if so?