Either the governor libeled the company, or he spoke truthfully. I don't see Schilling claiming libel, so essentially he wanted the governor to misrepresent t

Either the governor libeled the company, or he spoke truthfully. I don't see Schilling claiming libel, so essentially he wanted the governor to misrepresent the financial health of the company, right? Who, besides the people standing to take a loss, would be in favor of that?