3 ms·
does that mean you could also split the set in half multiple times then run it on each half of a half (etc) and combine it with its other half? that would seem
by throwaway14356 2y ago
does that mean you could also split the set in half multiple times then run it on each half of a half (etc) and combine it with its other half?
that would seem simpler to me.
edit: oh but then you would need to keep the results which defeats the purpose
- lokar 2y agoYou would need to assume a uniform distribution of items, which I don’t think this does