3 ms·
This isn't about pettiness or thin skin. And it's not about mean words. It's about potential valid, corroborated criticism of misconduct. They can totally deal
by ecjhdnc2025 2y ago
This isn't about pettiness or thin skin. And it's not about mean words. It's about potential valid, corroborated criticism of misconduct.
They can totally deal with appearing petty and thin-skinned.
- parpfish 2y agoWouldnt various whistleblower protections apply if you were reporting illegal activities?
- ecjhdnc2025 2y agoHonestly I don't know if whistleblower protections are really worth a damn -- I could be wrong. But would they not only protect the individual formally blowing the whistle (meeting the standard in the relevant law)? These non-disparagement clauses would have the effect of laying the groundwork for a whistleblowing effort to fall flat, because nobody else will want to corroborate, when the role of journalism in whistleblowing cases is absolutely crucial. No sensible mature company needs a lifetime non-disparagement clause -- especially not one that claims to have an ethical focus. It's clearly Omerta. Whoever downvoted this: seriously. I really don't care but you need to explain to people why lifetime non-disparagement clauses are not about maintaining silence. What's the ethical application for them?