2 ms·
Yeah, there should be multiple massive disclaimers on this site. I'd be worried about regulatory issues as well. Edit: why disagree?
by giantg2 2y ago
Yeah, there should be multiple massive disclaimers on this site. I'd be worried about regulatory issues as well.
Edit: why disagree?
- ghiculescu 2y agoWhy? Anyone who invests based on such obviously wrong numbers shouldn’t be protected from themselves.
- giantg2 2y agoThe concern isn't that they would invest bed on obviously wrong numbers. The concern is that someone invests based on believable numbers that are incorrect. There's no information on accuracy measures or verification. Offering this model to others could be an SEC/FINRA violation.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- jefozabuss 2y agoLikely the people who downvoted have no experience with the legal part of stock related discussions/tools (implied expectations/suggestions, etc), there is a reason why you see "not a financial advice" and other legal texts presented in videos discussing stocks. Also there is no real company / person mentioned as an owner at least on the website so the privacy policy is kind of a "trust me bro".