3 ms·
Yeah, I'm just saying that maybe Thunderbird should create their own package to ensure 100% is as they want it. Ports only gives myself a selection chosen by t
by doublerabbit 2y ago
Yeah, I'm just saying that maybe Thunderbird should create their own package to ensure 100% is as they want it.
Ports only gives myself a selection chosen by the packager, for example Chromium package does not have PulseAudio enabled. I had to recompile it myself to enable Pulse.
- prmoustache 2y ago> Yeah, I'm just saying that maybe Thunderbird should create their own package to ensure 100% is as they want it. That was not really the tone of your original comment. They have perfectly the right to not care enough to not care enough to package it themselves. I am fine if they are just willing to correct bugs and/or upstream any patch a freebsd port maintainer would send them. Besides you can change ports compilation options with `make config` as well as forking the ports into your own local repo on which you would maintain your own patches if needed. That can be done without any work from the thunderbird or FreeBSD teams.
- doublerabbit 2y agoEither or. No listing of FreeBSD.