3 ms·
Millions of people falsely believing that the earth is flat is not a good reason for the Journal of Astrophysical Research to waste time, pages, or screen real
by bell-cot 2y ago
Millions of people falsely believing that the earth is flat is not a good reason for the Journal of Astrophysical Research to waste time, pages, or screen real estate running a "The Earth is Not Flat" article. (Admission: I'm so d*mn old that I don't believe performative virtue to be an acceptable substitute for intelligently attempting to fix real-world problems.)
The JPost article is 99% worthless as a rebuttal for "that never happens" denialism - because it has zero cites to original sources. (Or is my AV software erasing a sidebar full of links to supporting government documents?)
- hilux 2y agoI'm not sure what constitutes an "original source" in your eyes. The article quotes several people by name (including the current DA), and refers to specific cases.
- bell-cot 2y agoDo you see any credibility difference between these two? "The US Supreme Court says that five factors weigh strongly in favor of overruling Roe and Casey." - and - "Page 43 of the ruling - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf - states that five factors weigh strongly in favor of overruling Roe and Casey."