3 ms·
His point, I believe: artistically interpreting the motion and shape of humans or objects with larger moving parts makes animation look more on-style. But for
by mlyle 2y ago
His point, I believe: artistically interpreting the motion and shape of humans or objects with larger moving parts makes animation look more on-style.
But for "boring" rigid objects, there's less of this advantage; hence, the consistency benefits often are more important.
- numpad0 2y agounless it's Miyazaki films - in which case most humans are intended to be lifeless rigid objects and every machines are to be lifelike animations (/s)